Stinson v. Daniel
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
The ground of attack based on undue influence exerted over the grantor was unsupported by the evidence.
If the jury were authorized to find in favor of the complainants, it was because of the other ground of attack, to wit, the failure of delivery. The only person named as the grantee in the deed was Mrs. Stinson, who will be referred to herein as the grantee; and the proof is undisputed that the instrument never reached her until after the death of her father, the grantor. There is no conflict in the evidence bearing on the issue of delivery, except that one witness referred to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wellborn v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Whiddon v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Rushin v. Shields & BallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Myers v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Thomas v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Grice v. GriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Morris v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Cooper v. LittletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.