Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 22, 1975No. 73-1121Published

1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Powell

I join in the Court’s judgment, but I cannot concur in the opinion as I think it sweeps more broadly than is necessary and appears to resuscitate Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U. S. 67 (1972). Only last term in Mitchell v. W. T. Grant, Co. 416 U. S. 600 (1974), the Court significantly narrowed the precedential scope of Fuentes. In my concurrence in Mitchell, I noted:

“The Court’s decision today withdraws significantly from the full reach of [Fuentes’] principle, and to this extent I think it fair to say that the Fuentes opinion is overruled.” 416 U. S., at 623 (Powell, J., concurring).

Three…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API