Phillips Contracting, Inc. v. Hirst
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PIERCE * .
This review proceeding by petitioners, Phillips Contracting, Inc., and Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, requires us to consider the scope of workers’ compensation coverage under the traveling employee doctrine. The claimant, Steven R. Hirst, an out-of-state employee on a Colorado road crew, was severely injured while returning to his employer’s job site after completing a personal errand. The Industrial Claim Appeals Panel affirmed an order of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) awarding benefits for the injury. We affirm.
The evidence viewed in a light most…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wright v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Boulder v. StreebSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Alexander Film Company v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Silver Engineering Works, Inc. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Tatum-Reese Development Corp. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'NColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shelton v. Azar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Pacesetter Corp. v. CollettColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hodgate v. FerraroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- v. LujanColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Flint Energy Services, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.