Legal Opinion
Eads v. Hill
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 1990No. 49A02-8902-CV-35PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Presiding Judge.
Harry E. Eads and Robert E. Hooser appeal the trial court’s judgment declaring the Adult Relaxation Center an indecent nuisance, perpetually enjoining its operation, perpetually enjoining Eads and Hooser from operating any indecent nuisance, ordering the real estate upon which the relaxation center is located closed for any purpose for one year, and ordering the personal property in the relaxation center removed within one week, all pursuant to an action initiated by the Consolidated City of Indianapolis and Marion County, Indiana (City) under the Indecent Nuisance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Skendzel v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Muncie v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Corby v. SwankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re the Guardianship of Anthony J. Panzica, Protected Person, Anthony J. Panzica v. Real Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- S.S. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011