Legal Opinion

Hornby v. Hornby

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1946No. File No. 8846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSickel, J.

This is an action brought for the dissolution of a partnership and the appointment of a receiver to wind up its affairs. The defendant did- not contest either the dissolution or the appointment of a receiver. Rex Min-shall was appointed receiver by the court on January 24, 1942. He was replaced by Harold J. Pike on June 10, 1942. Pike assumed his duties pursuant to such appointment on July 18, 1942. Roscoe Knodell was appointed as receiver to succeed Pike on February 20, 1943, and made his final report on July 26, 1945. Among the claims reported by him was one filed by Frontier Refining…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Northwestern Engineering Co. v. EllermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Knickerbocker v. McKindley Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Cake v. MohunSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Holmes Mfg. Co. v. KennaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
  5. Sager Manufacturing Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Todd v. WinkelmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bettelyoun v. SandersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Bettelyoun v. SandersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API