Legal Opinion
Maberry v. Said
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 29, 1995No. 94-2416-JWLPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Maberry alleges that he was sold a truck without being told that the odometer had rolled over. He brings this action against defendants Sameer Said, S.A.S. Auto Sales, Inc. (SAS) and Citizens Bank & Trust (Citizens) citing a wide variety of legal theories. Presently before the court are Citizens’s motion for summary judgment (Doe. # 58); Mr. Said’s and SAS’s joint motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 62); and Citizens’s motion for summary judgment on Mr. Maberry’s credit reporting claims (Doc. # 71). For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Ling v. Jan's LiquorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ellis v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Taylor v. Quality Hyundai, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Lozada v. Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. EstesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Steele v. EllisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.