Legal Opinion

Blanford v. Nourse

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 26, 1960No. 59-184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, CHAS., Judge.

The appellant L. C. Blanford sued the appellees Frederic Russell Nourse and William Edward Lambert for damages for personal injuries which he received when he was struck by an automobile owned by the appellee Nourse and being driven by the appellee Lambert in his capacity as a Florida Highway Patrol auxiliary officer.

The facts upon which the case was decided were not in dispute. Blanford and *831Nourse, in their respective automobiles, had been involved in a minor rear end collision, in which Blanford’s car struck Nourse’s car from the rear. No injury to those parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Albritton v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Weber v. PorcoSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  5. Rinehart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Katz v. HarringtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Sargent v. LatanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Vecciarelli v. Johnson Ford, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API