Legal Opinion

Weber v. Porco

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 29, 1958PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

100 So.2d 146 (1958)

Carolyn B. WEBER and William C. Weber, Appellants,

v.

Albert A. PORCO, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 29, 1958.

Wheeler & Pelzner, Miami, for appellants.

Wicker & Smith and Jack A. Sudduth, Miami, for appellee.

THORNAL, Justice.

Appellants Carolyn B. Weber and William C. Weber, husband and wife, who were defendants in the court below, seek reversal of a summary judgment on a counterclaim filed by them against appellee Porco, who was plaintiff below, in an automobile negligence case.

The points before us are whether there was a genuine material issue of fact sufficient…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Albritton v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Dunn Bus Service, Inc. v. McKinleySupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Greene v. Miller Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Orefice v. AlbertSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Lisellotte Moyer, Etc. v. Martin Marietta Corp., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Proprietors Ins. Co. v. ValsecchiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Raydel, Ltd. v. MedcalfeSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  5. Smith v. City of Daytona BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API