Legal Opinion

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 30, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-351-JJFPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff, Mobil Oil Corporation’s (“Mobil”) Motion to Compel Discovery. (D.I. 58). Specifically, Mobil seeks to compel Advanced Environmental Technologies, Inc. (“AERT”) to comply with discovery requests on the issues of breach of a confidential relationship and patent invalidity. For the reasons outlined below, the Court will grant Mobil’s Motion to Compel Discovery.

II. BACKGROUND

Mobil commenced this suit on June 9,1992 by filing a declaratory judgment action against AERT seeking a judgment that four AERT patents are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Spectronics Corporation v. H.B. Fuller Company, Inc., and H.B. Fuller Automotive Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. International Medical Prosthetics Research Associates, Inc., D/B/A Impra, Inc. v. Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc., and W.L. Gore and Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Biacore, AB v. Thermo Bioanalysis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  2. Bryan Ashley International, Inc. v. Shelby Williams Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
  3. Joint Stock Society v. UDV North America, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  4. Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics System Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API