Legal Opinion

Appeal From Ordinance, Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1930No. Appeal 212PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This appeal is from an order of the quarter sessions holding that proceedings for annexation to the City of Pittsburgh of a certain part of Penn Township were in conformity with the Act of June 8, 1874, P. L. 279. Pittsburgh is a city of the second class.

Appellants, describing themselves as “citizens and taxpayers” of the township, contend in this court, by their statement of questions involved, that the act of 1874 is:

1, impliedly repealed by the Act of April 28, 1903, P. L. 332.

2, expressly repealed by the Act of May 9, 1929, P. L. 1694.

Pursuant to rule 61, a brief was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Commonwealth v. CurrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Gentile v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Provident Life & Trust Co. v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salvation Army CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Kingston Boro. v. KalanoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API