Legal Opinion

Contractors Equipment Maintenance Co. ex rel. United States v. Bechtel Hanford, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2005No. 04-35344; D.C. No. CV-02-05006-RHWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

P.W. Stephens (“Stephens”), a subcontractor, defaulted on its multi-year subcontract with Bechtel Hanford, Inc. (“Bechtel”) to perform environmental clean up work at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation (“the Hanford site”). The district court awarded Bechtel damages and attorney’s fees, costs, and prejudgment interest from Acstar Insurance Company (“Acstar”), a performance and payment bond surety for Stephens.

On appeal, Acstar contests the district court’s award of damages and attorney’s fees, costs, and prejudgment interest, and asserts that it was entitled to equitable subrogation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. United States ex rel. Building Rentals Corp. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Contractors Equipment Maintenance Co. v. Bechtel Hanford, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United Coastals Insurance v. Bechtel Hanford, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API