Legal Opinion
Tulip Computers, Internationali B v. v. Dell Computer Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 9, 2002No. CIV.A.00-981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a patent infringement case. On November 24, 2000, Tulip Computer International B.V. (“Tulip”) 1 filed its complaint (D.I.1) alleging infringement of its U.S. patent No. 5,594,621 (“the ’621 patent”) by specific systems in defendant Dell Computer Corporation’s (“Dell”) 2 OptiPlex line of computers. On January 19, 2001, Dell filed its answer (D.I.6) denying Tulip’s allegations and alleging that the ’621 patent is invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed. On August 15, 2002, this court entered an amended scheduling…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. Ex Rel. Simco Division v. Ion Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- BIOVAIL LABORATORIES, INC. v. Torpharm, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Synergetics, Inc. v. Peregrine Surgical, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006