Legal Opinion

Hanley v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERVATION

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1954No. 29,170PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilkison, C. J.

On May 27, 1953, appellant filed his complaint in Marion Superior Court, Room 3, against appellees, asking a declaratory judgment that section 11-1424, Burns’ 1942 Repl., Cumulative Supplement, be declared unconstitutional. Upon motion properly made the venue of the cause was changed to the Hancock Circuit Court. In due time a second amended complaint was filed, and the same was put at issue by answer.

Upon trial there was a finding for appellees, that Sec. 11-1424 Burns’ 1942 Repl. Cumulative Supplement is constitutional, that plaintiff take nothing by his complaint, and that defendants…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Blue v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Commonwealth v. HanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Whittington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. City of Aurora v. BRYANTIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Clarke Auto Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Board of Commissioners v. Kokomo City Plan CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API