Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. Michigan Railroad Commission
District Court, E.D. Michigan
• In Equity. Suits by the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada and by the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company against the Michigan Railroad Commission and others. On application for interlocutory injunction.
1Per curiam
The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada and the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company filed each its separate bill to restrain the Michigan Railroad Commission and the Attorney General of that state from enforcing certain orders of the Commission made under the authority of the Michigan Railroad Commission Act (being Act No. 300 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1909, as amended by Act No. 139, P. A. Mich. 1911), relating to the intracity transportation of car load freight between complainants’ terminal tracks and their junctions with other roads, and to restrain the enforcement…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- United States v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Louisville Water Co. v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
- Andrews Steel Co. v. Davis, Director GeneralCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925