Legal Opinion
Andrews Steel Co. v. Davis, Director General
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided October 9, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Reversing.
The Andrews Steel Company and the Newport Rolling Mill Company are located about a mile apart in the yard limits of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company in or. near Newport, Kentucky. For a number of years these two companies have been shipping freight’ to each other by having the L. & N., and during the time it was under federal control, the Director General, switch loaded cars from the consignor’s spur track over a short distance of main line to the consignee’s spur track. The record satisfactorily shows that the ears used for such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Covington Stock-Yards Co. v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Los Angeles Switching CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Michigan Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Crescent Coal Co. v. L. & N. R. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HigdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Newport Rolling Mill Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Andrews Steel Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Newport Rolling Mill Co. v. L N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1961