Legal Opinion
Frueh v. Kupper
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 2, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
54 N.J. Super. 296 (1959)
148 A.2d 743
ROMAN FRUEH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THEODORE KUPPER, DEFENDANT AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
WALTER FRUEH, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided February 13, 1959.
Supplemental Opinion March 2, 1959.
Mr. Morris Pajonk (Mr. Arthur C. Gundersdorf appearing), attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Fred W. Jung, Jr. (Mr. Robert E. Monaghan appearing), attorney for defendant.
Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake (Mr. H. Curtis Meanor appearing), attorneys for third-party defendant.
SCHNEIDER, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
The third-party defendant brings a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benazet v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970