Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Oakland Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1926No. Calendar 32,677PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The city of Detroit owns by gift 65 acres of land two miles beyond its limits in the city of Royal Oak, Oakland county. It is maintained as a zoological park, and is constantly being improved. To secure a better entrance to the park, the city, under Act No. 149, Pub. Acts 1911, as amended by Act No. 37, Pub. Acts 1925, instituted condemnation proceedings to acquire privately owned lands in Oakland county, to be used for such purpose. These proceedings were successfully resisted by the owners, the trial court, upon motion, entering an order dismissing the petition. They are here reviewed upon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. City of Kalamazoo v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. City of Coldwater v. TuckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Clements v. McCabeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. City of Detroit v. WeilMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wayne Village President v. Wayne Village ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Rusha v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. City of Lansing v. Edward Rose Realty, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Curry v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In Re City of Detroit for Condemnation of Lands for AirportMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API