Beachem v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
Reversal was predicated upon appellant’s bill of exception number four, which the State urges was too general in the objections stated, that the same evidence was developed by appellant’s attorney on cross examination of the witness, and that part of the evidence objected to was admissible, and, therefore, a general objection to all of it was unavailing.
The bill of exception in question recites that over appellant’s objection Miss Westmoreland testified as follows: “That on the morning after the robbery she was called to the City Jail…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Stanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
- Kennison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.