Serinto v. Borman Food Stores
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
A jury awarded plaintiff Catherine Serinto damages for an injury she received when she stepped and fell on a broken mayonnaise jar on the floor of defendant Borman Food Stores, and damages in her husband’s suit for medical expenses, loss of services, and consortium. The trial court refused defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs’ proofs and, also, refused a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
The Court of Appeals set forth the issue by stating (3 Mich App 183, 188):
“The sole issue raised in these appeals is whether or not the plaintiffs proved a prima…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carpenter v. Herpolsheimer's Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Dalton v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Lambert v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Serinto v. Borman Food StoresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by55 opinions
- Berryman v. K Mart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- S C Gray, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Clark v. Kmart Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Forcier v. Grand Union Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Whitmore v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.