Legal Opinion

Serinto v. Borman Food Stores

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1966No. Docket 262, 263PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

This is an appeal from judgments awarded to the plaintiffs in 2 suits tried concurrently. The theory was negligence, and the incident which gave rise to the motion was a fall taken by plaintiff in defendant’s supermarket.

The facts as stated by defendant in its brief are undisputed.

*187On Good Friday, March 27, 1959, plaintiff Catherine Serinto was dropped off by her husband, plaintiff in the derivative suit, at defendant’s Pood Pair grocery market in Lincoln Park. The time was about 10:50 a. m.

The general layout of the store was described by Mrs. Serinto at the trial. The store was laid out in a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yacobian v. VartanianMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Serinto v. Borman Food StoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Isom v. FarrugiaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Huhtala v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Suci v. MirskyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Holliday v. National Dairy Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API