Legal Opinion

Franz v. Raymond Eisenhardt & Sons, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 28, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-4070 (HAA)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.

On September 20, 1988, Mr. Robert C. Franz brought this age discrimination and retaliation action against Raymond Eisen-hardt & Sons, Inc. (“Eisenhardt”), pursuant to the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34. Before me now is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, challenging the plaintiffs ability to make his prima facie case as to his age discrimination and retaliation claims.

BACKGROUND

The parties have agreed to the following facts contained in the pretrial order (“pto”) filed with this court on December 26,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sam Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC (072742)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. D'Annunzio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  3. Estate of Myroslava Kotsovska v. Saul Liebman (073861)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. Pukowsky v. CarusoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  5. Stomel v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API