Legal Opinion
Starkman v. Sigmond
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 25, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
184 N.J. Super. 600 (1982)
446 A.2d 1249
TAMI STARKMAN AND DORA BIRNBAUM, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ROBERT SIGMOND AND BARBARA SIGMOND, HIS WIFE, AND PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Camden County.
Decided March 25, 1982.
Ira Rabkin for plaintiffs (Molotsky, Rabkin & Gross, attorneys).
Michael Weiss for defendants Sigmond (Morris Goldsmith, attorney).
DEIGHAN, J.S.C.
The question to be resolved herein is whether plaintiff mortgagors are entitled to the proceeds of a fire insurance policy (which insures the interest of both the mortgagors…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Savarese v. Ohio Farmers Insurance Co. of LeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Schoolcraft v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Walker v. Queen Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Reed v. Firemen's InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Ramsdell v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loving v. Ponderosa Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- General GMC Sales, Inc. v. PassarellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Loving v. Ponderosa Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983