Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rehn v. Bingaman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1953No. 33238Published

1ConcurrenceBoslaugh, J.

I agree that the order overruling the motion of appellant for summary judgment was not an appealable order and that this appeal was properly dismissed. I protest the reasons given for the decision.

The basis of the decision I respectfully suggest should have been that the order sought to be reviewed by this appeal was one made in a special proceeding but it was not “an order affecting a substantial right.” The majority opinion states that the denial of a motion for a summary judgment did not determine the action, did not prevent a judgment, or affect a substantial right. This is followed by…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Grier v. CableIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Dow v. LillieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API