Rehn v. Bingaman
Nebraska Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceBoslaugh, J.
I agree that the order overruling the motion of appellant for summary judgment was not an appealable order and that this appeal was properly dismissed. I protest the reasons given for the decision.
The basis of the decision I respectfully suggest should have been that the order sought to be reviewed by this appeal was one made in a special proceeding but it was not “an order affecting a substantial right.” The majority opinion states that the denial of a motion for a summary judgment did not determine the action, did not prevent a judgment, or affect a substantial right. This is followed by…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Grier v. CableIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Dow v. LillieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.