Legal Opinion

Byram v. Main

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 10, 1987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

Defendant Peter Main appeals from a judgment entered on August 22, 1986, by the Superior Court (Penobscot County) in the amount of $27,483.52 for plaintiff Ray Byram. After a jury-waived trial the court found Main strictly liable for damages to Byram's tractor-trailer rig caused in the early morning hours of July 22, 1981, when Byram’s rig struck Meadow, the pet donkey of Main’s daughter, which had escaped from its enclosure and wandered onto Interstate 95 in Orono. The judgment here on review was entered following a second trial in this case, on remand from plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Decker v. GammonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
  2. Dotson v. MatthewsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Scribner v. KelleyNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Dyer v. MudgettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  5. Byram v. MainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Andersen,. v. Two Dot Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lollar v. PoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. In Re Hannaford Bros. Co. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
  4. Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  5. Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API