Legal Opinion

Byram v. Main

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 15, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

Ray J. Byram appeals from a judgment for the defendant, Peter Main, entered after the Superior Court granted Main’s motion for a directed verdict. We hold that there was sufficient evidence to present the question of negligence to the jury. We *1296therefore vacate the judgment of the Superior Court.

Early one morning in July, 1981, Byram was driving a tractor trailer truck north on Interstate 95 in Orono when he struck and killed a donkey owned by Main. The donkey, named Meadow, was a pet of one of Main’s daughters. It had escaped from its enclosure during the night, apparently by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Decker v. GammonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
  2. Dyer v. MudgettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  3. Briggs v. Lake Auburn Crystal Ice Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WoodsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Henry v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Byram v. MainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API