McCready v. PAYLESS SHOESOURCE

I respectfully dissent from my colleagues’ conclusion that McCready’s injuries of September 9,2005, arose “out of’ her employment. In summary, I would conclude the fall was the result of normal activities of day-to-day living and therefore not compensable under K.S.A. 44-508(e).

*95The facts appear to be undisputed and are stated in appellants’ brief: “claimant exited a friend’s car on respondent’s premises, turned to walk down the sidewalk to the door and fell. She does not say she slipped, tripped or that the sidewalk had anything to do with causing her fall.” According to claimant, she…