Legal Opinion
Hanover Insurance v. Emmaus Municipal Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 10, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 32491PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff has presented for our decision a Motion for Appointment of a Master and a Motion to Amend its Complaint.
The factual situation out of which this civil action arose is identical with that involved in Civil Action No. 31036, D.C., a companion case in which we have this same date filed an opinion denying a Motion by the plaintiff therein, Consolidated Constructors, Inc., to Amend the Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
The pertinent facts are more fully set out in that opinion but we will repeat them insofar as they bear upon the instant motion of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kerrigan's Estate v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Friedman v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nationwide Retirement Solutions, Inc. v. Alabama State Personnel BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Russell v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Thermal Dynamics Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1967
- Forbes & Wallace, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Ex parte Steve Marshall, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Megan Carmack and Leigh Gulley Manning, individually and on behalf of minor children, Michaelyn Leigh Manning and Michael Sanders Manning v. Regions Bank, in its fiduciary capacity as trustee of the Mabel Amos Memorial Fund) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-22-900830).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.