Legal Opinion

Hinchey v. Starrett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1914No. 8,991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

It is insisted that the measure of damages is the difference between the value.of the land and $1600, the sum at which it was to be taken off the plaintiff’s hands, instead of the difference between the value of the land and the value of the car — on the theory that the plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of his bargain. Had the land been as represented its value might have been much more than the price fixed for the car, but the plaintiff can at most claim nothing beyond the difference between such price and the value of the land, and hence,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. Epp v. HintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. George v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. McDanel v. WhalenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Page v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cofield v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Anderson v. HeasleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Perry v. Schoonover Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Miller v. ThayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API