Legal Opinion
Kiwala v. Biermann
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 1977No. 38187PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Presiding Judge.
Appellant Robert Kiwala appeals from a judgment in favor of respondents James and Victoria Biermann, husband and wife, denying his petition for a mandatory injunction. The injunction sought to command respondents to cease and desist from utilizing a private road as a means of ingress and egress to respondents’ property. For reasons herein given, we affirm the judgment.
Appellant is the owner of Lot No. 5, in fee simple, of Fontainebleau Estates Subdivision and as such owner of an easement for the usage of Fontainebleau Drive (also known as Afshari Drive), a private…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barnard v. GaumerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Western Heights Land Corp. v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- St. Louis Safe Deposit & Savings Bank v. Kennett EstateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Reutner v. VougaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Miller v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Baum v. Glen Park PropertiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Preshlock v. BrennerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Robert Jackson Real Estate Co. v. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Cheatham v. MeltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ephrata Area School District v. County of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.