Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hauffe

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1977No. 4713PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants seek reversal of a judgment denying them damages for injuries sustained during an altercation in a bar. Their notice of appeal was not timely, and we must dismiss this appeal by virtue of our rules and prior decisions.

The judgment and decree herein were filed on February 5,1976; motions for new trial and to alter or amend judgment also were filed that day. According to Rule 73(a), W.R.C.P., the running of the time for appeal was then suspended until the entry of an order granting or denying these motions. Rule 59, W.R.C.P., under which these motions were filed, provides that if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brasel & Sims Construction Co. v. Neuman Transit Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sun Land & Cattle Co. v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. McMullen v. McMullenWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue & Taxation v. IrvineWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Martinez v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. DeWitt v. BalbenWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Paxton Resources, L.L.C. v. BrannamanWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BergerWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API