Legal Opinion

Pullman v. Outzen

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1996No. 95-260PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

The issue presented in this case is whether appellee owes appellant a duty to clear snow and ice from the front steps of a trailer home. Concluding that the natural accumulation rule bars the imposition of such a duty, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

I.ISSUES

Appellant presents the following issues:

A Did the lower court correctly grant summary judgment to the defendant on the issue of causation where:

1. The court determined that there was a single cause of the plaintiff’s injuries while ignoring several causation factors asserted in the complaint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Downen v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Erasmus v. Chicago Housing AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Sherman v. Platte CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Eiselein v. K-Mart, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. PARKER BLDG. SERVICES CO., INC. v. LightseySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Selby v. Conquistador Apartments, Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Makeeff v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Landsiedel v. BUFFALO PROPERTIES, LLC.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Pinnacle Bank v. VillaWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API