Legal Opinion

Ricci v. Patrick

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 1, 2008No. 07-2522, 07-2523PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Chief Judge.

The Governor of Massachusetts and the state Department of Mental Retardation (“DMR”) appeal from an order of a federal district court which both reopens a 1993 consent decree and then requires them to take certain steps as to the residents of the Fernald Developmental Center. Ricci v. Okin (Ricci IV), 499 F.Supp.2d 89 (D.Mass.2007). Appellants, whom we shall call the Commonwealth, deny that the court had any authority to reopen the consent decree or otherwise issue any orders.

The Commonwealth characterizes the order as essentially prohibiting it from relocating residents as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Frew Ex Rel. Frew v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Peter J. McNulty Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Aronov v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Davidson v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. M.D. v. Department of Developmental ServicesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  5. Ricci v. OkinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API