People v. Petrovic
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
Defendant Zoran Petrovic appeals a judgment following Ms felony conviction of possession or control of child pornography with a prior conviction for child molestation. (Pen. Code, § 311.11, subd. (b).)
Petrovic relies on a dictum in Tecklenburg v. Appellate Division (2009) 169 Cal.App.4th 1402 [87 Cal.Rptr.3d 460] to argue that section 311.11 is to be interpreted the same way that U.S. v. Kuchinski (9th Cir. 2006) 469 F.3d 853 interprets a federal child pornography statute (18 U.S.C. § 2252A'(a)(5)(B)). We do not do so because the federal and state statutes are different…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. CejaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. John Charles KuchinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- People v. BohanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Shepherd CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015