Legal Opinion

People v. Kent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 12, 2010PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Angiolillo, J.

In a prosecution for promoting and possessing computer images of child pornography, what is the evidentiary significance of a temporary Internet file automatically created by the computer’s Internet browser when a Web page is displayed on the computer screen? What is the evidentiary significance of the defendant’s knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the operation of this automatic saving mechanism? In this appeal, we determine these issues of first impression in New York, as well as other issues regarding the legal sufficiency of the evidence of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. AmanzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. MarshColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. BurgessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API