Legal Opinion

State v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 18, 2020No. A168630PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

47 Argued and submitted February 11; reversed in A168630, affirmed in A168631 March 18, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER THOMAS FULLER, Defendant-Appellant. Yamhill County Circuit Court 18CR25617, 18CR41611; A168630 (Control), A168631

463 P3d 605

Defendant’s half-sister gave him permission to live in her car but not to drive it. Defendant drove it. For that conduct, defendant was charged and convicted of unauthorized use of a vehicle (UUV), ORS 164.135(1)(a). On appeal, he assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, contending…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CivilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. HejaziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. WimmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API