Legal Opinion

Bollinger v. Carrier

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Ozark Circuit Court. — IIon. J. R. Woodside, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, C.

This is an action- of ejectment. The petition is in the usual form. Respondents, plaintiffs below, recovered judgment, from which the defendants have appealed.

There are no errors apparent from what is known as the record proper. The errors complained of are such as arose on the trial, and as such they can be brought to the attention of this court for’a review only by being preserved in a bill of exceptions. The record proper, instead of being made out separately, as it should be, independent of the bill of exceptions, is incorporated in what purports to be the bill of exceptions.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Exchange National Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. Williams v. Circuit Court of St. Louis countySupreme Court of Missouri · 1838
  4. Moran v. JanuarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Lynch v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Maloney v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Kansas City v. MastinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API