Legal Opinion

Duryea v. Edinger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1912No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Hillsdale; Chester, J. Bill by Theron Duryea and others against Joseph H. Edinger, drain commissioner, and others, for an injunction against the construction of a drain. From a decree for complainant Louisa Reynolds, but dismissing the bill as to the other complainants, they all appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case was commenced in the circuit court for the county of Hillsdale, in chancery, by com*219plainants, asking for an injunction to restrain the defendant Edinger, both individually and as drain commissioner, and other defendants as contractors, from constructing a proposed tile drain in accordance with certain plans and specifications adopted by said drain commissioner.

Upon the issue formed by the pleadings, testimony was taken in open court before the circuit judge, and a decree was entered, finding all the material facts alleged in the complainants’ bill of complaint true, in so far as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moore v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Smith v. CarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Crandall v. McElhenyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Township of Swan Creek v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Strack v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cummings v. GarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. McDermott v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Laraway v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API