Legal Opinion · Dissent

Appeal of Faehnrich v. Bentz Metal Products Co. (In Re Bentz Metal Products Co.)

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 7, 2001No. 00-1320Published

1Dissent

BAUER, Circuit Judge,

joined by FLAUM, Chief Judge, COFFEY, RIPPLE, and KANNE, Circuit Judges, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. Ours is still the sole Circuit to address whether a state’s mechanic’s lien law is preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), and although alone on the matter, we have given it much attention. Two panels of this Court and the en banc panel have eyed it, and this dissent takes one more look. I agree with the majority that the applicable legal principles are far “easier to mouth than to apply,” ante at 286, but I disagree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. National Metalcrafters v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Antol v. EspostoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Loewen Group International, Incorporated v. William J. HaberichterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. In re Bluffton Casting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API