Schumacher v. City of Clear Lake
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
I. Plaintiff’s property was specially assessed in 1930 for curbing and paving. The contract amounted to more than $5,000. By the resolution of necessity the entire cost, including cost of intersections, was to be levied as a special assessment. The contract called for extra excavation, which at the estimated yardage would amount to $600, but in fact amounted to less. There were deficits in the special assessments caused by reductions. The city paid for replacements of broken curbs and paid for incidentals. The result of these matters was that $1510.71 was paid from the general fund of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carlson v. City of MarshalltownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- State v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Matter of Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Zeo v. City Council of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sioux City v. Western Asphalt Paving Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Town of Mechanicsville v. State Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Roti v. WashingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Palensky v. Story County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023
- Roti v. WashingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983