Legal Opinion

Healey v. Worth

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Oakland Circuit. This was ejectment brought by plaintiff in error. The judgment below was for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

*Marston, J.:

The deed of November 5, 1839, from Augustus H. Torrey and wife to Galen Holbrook, having, upon the 14th day of June, 1875, had the proper certificate of the clerk of Yates county, New York, attached thereto, any defects which ,pre*160viously existed were thereby removed, and no further question could arise but that it had, in 1839, been executed according to the laws of the state of New York. It was, therefore, admissible in evidence upon the trial, as a perfect, valid instrustrument, ■ and with the other evidence in the case entitled plaintiff to recover, if the record of June…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Bank of Newberry v. LivingstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. Lariverre v. RainsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In the Matter of James E. Bennett, Bankrupt, Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit v. Donald W. Kreling, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. Aultman, Miller & Co. v. PettysMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Griffin v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API