Linder v. Street Improvement District No. 9

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

The question on this appeal is whether the omission of seven words in the published notice of hearing for creation of the appellee Improvement District, was sufficiently material as to invalidate such notice.

The facts are not in dispute: on October 6, 1954, the petition for creation of the District was duly filed with the City Clerk of Crossett, and the description of the District in that petition was admittedly correct. The published notice — required by § 20-104, 'Ark. Stats.— stated that the Council meeting to consider the petition would be held on…