Legal Opinion

Liney v. Chestnut Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1966No. Appeal, 283PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

In this action of trespass, the lower court sustained preliminary objections to the complaint in the nature of a demurrer and dismissed the action. This appeal challenges the correctness of that order.

The pertinent pleaded facts are as follows:

The defendant operates an automobile sales agency and garage. About ten o’clock a.m. on the day involved, a customer’s automobile was delivered to the garage for repairs. The defendant’s employees allowed the automobile to remain outside the building, double- parked in the street and with the key in the ignition. About three…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Anderson v. Bushong Pontiac Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Dahlstrom v. ShrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Green v. Independent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Norman I. Suchomajcz, Administrator of the Estate of Norman Suchomajcz, a Minor v. Hummel Chemical Company, Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Richardson Ex Rel. Estate of Richardson v. Carnegie Library Restaurant, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Glass v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API