Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. Vector Properties, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 3, 1995No. 81215PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STUBBLEFIELD, Judge.
This is an appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs after trial to the court on a claim for payment of real estate sales commission in connection with a lease. After a review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we affirm.
Plaintiff Burt H. McIntosh d/b/a The Lad-eo Group filed this action alleging that Defendants Tulsa Properties, Inc., and Vector Properties, Inc., had agreed to pay him a real estate sales commission for its brokerage services connected with the lease between Flint Industries and Bartlett Collins. Plaintiff originally sought judgment in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pracht v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Dodson v. Henderson Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- United Engines, Inc. v. McConnell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Rosser-Moon Furniture Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Sparks Bros. Drilling Co. v. Texas Moran Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Schaffart v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Commercial Financial Services, Inc. ex rel. Whitaker v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Freeman v. Bodyworks, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- COMMERCIAL FINANCIAL SERV. v. Great American Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.