Legal Opinion
Aerogroup International, Inc. v. Marlboro Footworks, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 4, 1997No. 96 Civ. 2717 (DLC)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COTE, District Judge:
Plaintiff Aerogroup International, Inc. (“Aerogroup”) has brought this action against Marlboro Footworks Ltd. (“Marlboro”), an American buying agent, and certain of its American and Canadian customers, alleging that the defendants have infringed its intellectual property rights in its Aero-soles shoes. Marlboro and one of its Canadian customers, Bata Industries Ltd. (“Bata”), have moved to dismiss this action insofar as it seeks to reach Canadian sales for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1 At issue is the extraterritorial reach of the Lanham Act and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tommaso Buti Fashion World Company, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees v. Impressa Perosa, S.R.L., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Velez v. VassalloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- PICCOLI A/S v. Calvin Klein Jeanswear Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Juicy Couture, Inc. v. Bella International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- International Diamond Importers, Inc. v. Oriental Gemco (N.Y.), Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.