Glantz v. Hopkins
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Lester L. Glantz appeals from the Lancaster County District Court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
As only a void judgment is subject to attack in a habeas corpus action, an appellate court is limited in such a case to reviewing a question of law, namely, is the judgment in question void? Berumen v. Casady, 245 Neb. 936, 515 N.W.2d 816 (1994).
To the extent questions of law are involved, an appellate court is obligated to reach conclusions independent of the decisions reached by the court below. State v. Burdette, 259 Neb. 679, 611 N.W.2d 615…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BurdetteNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Rehbein v. ClarkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Berumen v. CasadyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sanders v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Benitez v. RasmussenNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HenseNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AlfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.