Legal Opinion

Glantz v. Hopkins

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2001No. S-99-1202PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Lester L. Glantz appeals from the Lancaster County District Court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

As only a void judgment is subject to attack in a habeas corpus action, an appellate court is limited in such a case to reviewing a question of law, namely, is the judgment in question void? Berumen v. Casady, 245 Neb. 936, 515 N.W.2d 816 (1994).

To the extent questions of law are involved, an appellate court is obligated to reach conclusions independent of the decisions reached by the court below. State v. Burdette, 259 Neb. 679, 611 N.W.2d 615…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BurdetteNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Rehbein v. ClarkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Berumen v. CasadyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sanders v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Benitez v. RasmussenNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HenseNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. AlfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API