Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. Kreikemeier
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
NATURE OF CASE
This is a procedurally complicated civil contempt case, in which the Nebraska Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal with respect to the district court’s finding of contempt, but nonetheless affirmed the allowance of $73,500 in attorney fees and costs. For reasons that will be explained more fully below, we conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction to order equitable relief as a condition to purging its finding of contempt and that the remaining condition of the purge plan was not accompanied by a threatened sanction and was not reviewable on appeal. For those reasons,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smith v. Lincoln Meadows Homeowners Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Kasparek v. MayNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- Maddux v. MadduxNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Dunning v. TallmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Faith Baptist ChurchNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Wetovick v. County of NanceNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Blaine v. BlaineNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Tyler v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Interest of Fedalina G.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.