Legal Opinion

Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. Kreikemeier

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2006No. S-03-354, S-05-407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

NATURE OF CASE

This is a procedurally complicated civil contempt case, in which the Nebraska Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal with respect to the district court’s finding of contempt, but nonetheless affirmed the allowance of $73,500 in attorney fees and costs. For reasons that will be explained more fully below, we conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction to order equitable relief as a condition to purging its finding of contempt and that the remaining condition of the purge plan was not accompanied by a threatened sanction and was not reviewable on appeal. For those reasons,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. Lincoln Meadows Homeowners Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Kasparek v. MayNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Maddux v. MadduxNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dunning v. TallmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Faith Baptist ChurchNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wetovick v. County of NanceNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Blaine v. BlaineNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Tyler v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re Interest of Fedalina G.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API