Legal Opinion

Barvick v. Cisneros

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 18, 1996No. Civil Action 95-2245-GTVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.

This ease is before the court upon plaintiff Curt Barvick’s motion for summary judgment (Doe. 5) and upon the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 7). For the reasons stated below, the plaintiffs motion is denied and the defendant’s motion is granted.

Barviek is an investigator for the Kansas City, Kansas Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). On January 4, 1995, Barviek filed a civil rights grievance against HUD, alleging a pattern and practice of sexual discrimination in his office,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Capital City Press v. Metro. CouncilSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Wisdom v. United States Trustee ProgramDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Smith v. Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Scherer v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  5. Gerald W. Bavido v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API