Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1987No. 86-542PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented on appeal is whether a trial court can disregard a stipulation signed by all parties and filed with the clerk to dismiss the case without prejudice, and enter an order dismissing the case with prejudice.

This appeal is from a voluntary dismissal made pursuant to Rule 41(a), Ala.R.Civ.P. Donald M. Hammond and Elizabeth Hammond filed suit in the Circuit Court of Madison County in March 1983, against Eulalia Thetford Brooks and Norman Stephens, alleging fraud and misrepresentation in the sale of a residence. A default judgment was entered against Brooks on May 12, 1983, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bracy v. Sippial Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Bevill v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. The Scam Instrument Corporation v. Control Data CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. Miller v. ReddinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sealy, L.L.C. v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Ex parte ChesnutSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. Greene v. Town of Cedar BluffSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Reid v. TingleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API