Legal Opinion

Homewood Peoples Bank v. Simon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

This action is by an endorsee against the maker of a promissory note. At the trial, plaintiff proved execution and nonpayment of the obligation and rested. Defendant offered to prove the note was obtained from him by fraud and duress on part of payee; that it was necessary to give the note to procure payee’s release of a building from lien for work done and materials furnished ; that payee had presented a bill for extras over and above the contract price, which was questioned, and defendant made the note for the full amount of the disputed balance “on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Second National Bank v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Putnam v. Ensign Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Lowry National Bank v. HazardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Humphrey Et Ux. v. Brown Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. McCreary v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Levitt v. Johnstown Office Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Bucks Co. Trust Co. v. FellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API