Legal Opinion

Levitt v. Johnstown Office Supply Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1931No. Appeal 132PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kelleb, J.,

This is an action by the indorsee holder of a trade acceptance against the acceptor. It is a negotiable instrument, and hence, in the absence of proof, either appearing in his own case or presented by the defendant, that the title of the payee who negotiated the instrument to him was defective, the plaintiff is to be deemed prima facie a holder in due course: Sec. 59 of the Negotiable Instruments Law of 1901, P. L. 194; Putnam v. Ensign Oil Co., 272 Pa. 301. What is meant by “defective title” within the meaning of this section is set forth in section 55.

The plaintiff,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Second National Bank v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Putnam v. Ensign Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Ward v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. International Fin. Co. v. Magilansky Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Luikart v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Bartoshesky v. Houston Trading Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  4. Colonial Fi. Co. v. Hoover Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Bucks Co. Trust Co. v. FellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API